For drivers in Shasta and Humboldt counties dealing with a persistent vehicle defect, one of the most frustrating questions is, “How many times do I have to get this car fixed?” The answer lies in one of the most important components of the California Lemon Law: the “reasonable number of repair attempts” rule. This rule is a legal presumption that makes it easier for consumers to prove their vehicle is a lemon. Without it, you would have to argue in court that the manufacturer’s failure to fix your car was unreasonable—a much more difficult task.
What Does “Reasonable” Actually Mean?
The California Lemon Law provides specific guidelines for what is considered a “reasonable” number of repair attempts. It’s not a subjective judgment but a clear legal standard designed to protect consumers. A vehicle is legally presumed to be a lemon if, within the first 18 months or 18,000 miles (whichever comes first), it meets one of the following criteria:
- Four or More Repair Attempts:The vehicle has been brought in for repair four or more times for the same non-safety-related defect, and the issue has not been fixed.
- Two or More Repair Attempts for a Safety Issue:The vehicle has been brought in for at least two repair attempts for a serious defect that could cause death or serious bodily injury (e.g., faulty brakes, steering, or airbags).
- 30+ Days Out of Service:The vehicle has been out of service for repairs for a cumulative total of more than 30 calendar days for any number of defects.
These presumptions are the foundation of many CA Lemon Law cases. They provide a clear path forward and put the burden of proof on the manufacturer to show that the vehicle is not a lemon.
Don’t let your car’s problems add up. The law provides a clear path to a solution.
Practical Examples for Northern California Drivers
Let’s apply these rules to common scenarios. Imagine a driver in Humboldt, CA, who buys a new truck with a persistent, nagging rattle in the dashboard. If they take the truck to the dealership four times, and the rattle is still present after the fourth attempt, the vehicle is legally presumed to be a lemon under California law. At this point, a skilled CA Lemon Law lawyer can confidently assert that the vehicle qualifies as a lemon.
Now consider a different case for a driver in Shasta. Their new SUV has an issue where the brakes occasionally fail to engage immediately. Because this is a safety-related defect, the manufacturer only gets two chances to fix it. If the second repair attempt fails, the driver can begin the process of a Lemon Law claim in Shasta, CA, for a refund or replacement. This is why it’s so critical to get a repair order for every single visit and to clearly state the problem each time.
Don’t Do It Alone
Navigating these legal complexities can be overwhelming. A manufacturer’s representative will often try to delay or deny your claim, hoping you’ll give up. That’s why having a dedicated car Lemon Law attorney in Humboldt, CA, is crucial. They understand the intricacies of the law and can ensure you get the compensation you deserve. Building a strong case under the Lemon Law in Humboldt, CA, requires meticulous documentation, and an attorney will guide you through every step.
Get a Free Case Evaluation Today
If you’re a driver in Humboldt or Shasta and believe your vehicle is a lemon, don’t wait. The first step is to consult with an expert. Ron Marquez Law Corp is a trusted Lemon Law firm in Humboldt, CA, that offers free consultations and operates on a contingency fee basis, so you pay nothing unless we win your case. Contact us today to learn more about your rights and get the professional help you need.
